Investigating Claims of NASA's Deception In Space Travel

In recent years, a growing number of conspiracy theories have emerged, casting doubt on the authenticity of NASA's space travel missions.

NASA's Neil Armstrong on the Moon but which image is real and which is not.

The International Space Station CGI rendering you can't tell the difference between real or CGI.

Let's get into it.

{getToc} $title={Table of Contents}

Many individuals claim that NASA has been using green screens, special effects, harnesses, and wires to deceive the public.


Allegations of objects appearing from nowhere, astronauts disappearing, and suspicious activity have raised concerns about the credibility of space exploration. In this blog post, I will critically examine these claims, separating fact from fiction.

NASA's Commitment to Space Exploration:

Before delving into the conspiracy theories, it is important to acknowledge NASA's decades-long commitment to space exploration. From the iconic Apollo missions to the ongoing International Space Station (ISS) operations, NASA has consistently contributed to scientific advancements and our understanding of the universe.

Please share this post{alertSuccess}

The facts speak for themselves and the research must have been carried out for the answers to have come into being I mean that's just common sense. Unless they already had the answer and created the middle so to speak and elaborately created expensive missions whilst simultaneously running black ops alongside the public shenanigans or displays of advances in science and space technology.

Elon Musk once bragged about SpaceX having better CGI animation than NASA which begs the question why do these behemoths need CGI in the first place?

Analyzing the Allegations:

1. Examining NASA’s Use of Green Screens and Virtual Reality: 

A critical analysis of the claims suggesting NASA's use of green screens and virtual reality to fabricate the illusion of space travel warrants scrutiny. While proponents of NASA's credibility point to extensive documentation, including live streams and photographs, as evidence against these allegations, a more critical evaluation is necessary to fully understand the issue at hand.

Firstly, although the documentation is extensive, it is important to recognize that such visual content can be manipulated or edited to present a desired narrative. The ability to digitally alter images and videos has become increasingly sophisticated, often leaving room for doubt when relying solely on visual evidence.

Secondly, the argument that the intricate details and scientific experiments conducted in space would be impossible to simulate convincingly on a green screen may not be entirely accurate. With advancements in technology, such as computer-generated imagery (CGI) and virtual reality, it is possible to create remarkably realistic simulations of various environments and scientific experiments. Thus, asserting the inability to replicate space travel on a green screen may not be as conclusive as initially claimed.

Furthermore, while live streams provide viewers with a real-time experience, it also allows for potential manipulations or post-production alterations. These possibilities highlight the need for a critical eye and independent scrutiny to eliminate any doubts surrounding the authenticity of the content.

Addressing our concerns:

To address these concerns, it would be beneficial for NASA to provide more transparent and easily verifiable evidence. This could involve the implementation of open-source, third-party monitoring systems during space missions, ensuring that the live streams and documentation cannot be tampered with or controlled solely by NASA personnel.

Ultimately, a critical evaluation of NASA's use of green screens and virtual reality should not dismiss the claims outright, but rather foster an environment of increased transparency and independent verification. By addressing these concerns, NASA can alleviate doubts and reinforce its credibility in the eyes of the public. Allowing independent third-party scrutiny would be a good thing and should ultimately be the taxpayer's choice.

2. Harnesses, Wires, and Special Effects: Conspiracy theorists argue that astronauts have been caught on camera using harnesses and wires, indicating that their movements are artificially manipulated. While some videos may seem suspicious, it is essential to apply critical analysis. Occasional mishaps can occur during spacewalks when astronauts manoeuvre in microgravity. These instances should not be automatically attributed to deceitful practices. But we can't dismiss it outright because we see what we see and what it looks like.

3. Disappearing or Appearing Objects: Claims of objects appearing or disappearing from thin air in space footage are often accompanied by speculation. However, optical illusions, the reflection of light, or the effects of microgravity can cause objects to seemingly appear out of nowhere or disappear. Understanding these phenomena, rather than assuming manipulation, can provide a more rational explanation. But under the circumstances of what the camera picked up in general people don't usually disappear or begin to disappear until they have rounded the corner and not until.

Investigating the Claims:

{getCard} $type={post} $title={Moon Landing Mystery}

1. Independent Analysis:

Experts in CGI, special effects, and photography will need to independently examine the alleged evidence of manipulation. Their findings should either dismiss the case and debunk the theories, explaining the phenomena as natural occurrences rather than intentional deception or their findings will back up the claims.

2. Astronaut Testimonies:

Astronauts who have journeyed into space come from diverse backgrounds, and nationalities, and have varying political affiliations. The notion that all astronauts would willingly participate in an elaborate deception involving green screens and wires is highly improbable but not impossible. Human beings are not impervious to manipulation and as humans often do we may buy Into believing that some things are for the greater good for example inspiring people to get into science and engineering.

3. NASA's Credibility:

NASA is a globally renowned organization that involves thousands of employees, scientists, and engineers. A deception of this magnitude would require an extraordinary level of coordination and secrecy, making it highly unlikely. Unless it's compartmentalized and it only becomes apparent at a certain level or a certain place with people on the outside of a specific duty not having any access to the place where the deception is taking place?


What other theories or claims have arisen regarding NASA's space travel?

How can we educate the public to differentiate between legitimate scientific research and baseless conspiracy theories?

Here are some theories or claims that have emerged regarding NASA's space travel:

1. Moon Landing Hoax:

One prominent conspiracy theory suggests that the Apollo moon landings were faked by NASA. Supporters of this theory argue that the footage and photographs from the moon missions show inconsistencies, such as the waving American flag and the absence of stars in the images.

2. UFO Cover-up:

Some conspiracy theorists believe that NASA is part of a massive cover-up regarding the existence of extraterrestrial life. They claim that NASA intentionally hides evidence of UFO sightings and encounters during space missions.

3. Secret Space Programs:

Another theory suggests that NASA is involved in secretive space programs, carrying out classified missions and experiments beyond the public's knowledge. Supporters argue that NASA's public activities are merely a cover for these covert operations.

The public must be able to differentiate between legitimate scientific research and baseless conspiracy theories, here are some suggestions:

Promote Science Literacy: Encourage scientific education and critical thinking


While conspiracy theories surrounding NASA's space travel may capture the imagination, a closer examination of factual evidence and critical thinking can debunk such claims. The extensive documentation, independent analysis, and rational explanations all contribute to reaffirming NASA's credibility in its endeavours to explore the vast unknown. Bill Nye states that the Earth is a closed system and that we cannot leave it and there's no place to go. We often see rockets go up and veer off and it plummets to the Earth. The top of the rocket then takes over the journey after separating from the main rocket and that's when we see what we are shown on the TV. If Bill Nye is to be believed then this too cannot be real.

When assessing sensational claims, it is vital to prioritize evidence-based research and avoid falling into the trap of misinformation. By maintaining an objective and informed perspective, we can foster a deeper understanding and appreciation for humanity's ongoing exploration of space.

If you've got any thoughts on NASA and the video footage showing Astronauts seemingly using harnesses and if you've got another bizarre-looking inconsistency to show us in one of NASA's video footage then please let us know in the comments section below.

Also please don't forget to share this post and as always keep your eyes on the sky and you're bound to see something strange like the thousands of people who have sent in UFO sightings to me. Contact me through WhatsApp if you've got a UFO sighting to report, cheers{alertInfo}

{getButton} $text={WhatsApp} $icon={whatsapp} $color={Hex Color}

Credit: NASA/Brevard County Commission/Unknown Floridian/UFO Sightings Footage/UFOs Footage/UFO Sightings UK/Canva.

Thank you for leaving a message, your comments are visible for the world to see.
Lee Lewis UFO Researcher
UFO Sightings Footage

Previous Post Next Post