UFO Mothership Releases 30 Plus UFOs Filmed by 2 Different People

I like this UFO video because it's a totally different one compared to other UFO videos from recent times.


There's unprecedented UFO behaviour going on that should not be possible but yet this unusual event was recorded separately by 2 different eye witnesses in 2 different places.


That's why I am saying that it's an unprecedented video the likes of which "if proven" has defied the laws of physics. These similar size UFOs coming out of the Mothership should not be possible. 



ufo-mothership-releasing-many-orb-ufos.



This is absolutely unprecedented video footage of multiple UFOs actually disembark from a Mothership which when put together there's no way that they can fit back inside of their Mothership! 













What's coming out technically isn't capable of doing that. In other words it's impossible but yet (and here's why I'm posting this) this was filmed from 2 different people in 2 different places! 



alfredo-carrillo-and-pedro-hernandez-both-filmed-a-ufo-mothership-at-the-same-time-in-different-places.



That's exactly why I am saying "unprecedented UFO footage". We're l stand on this right now, I'm on the fence leaning towards this been real.



Related post:


I'm leaning towards that opinion, because it is a very real looking, gut feeling and it was filmed from 2 different places by 2 different people. 













There's no way 2 faked videos can be married up with the exact same effects from 2 different vantage points. 



ufo-looks-like-a-light-releasing-entities.




This task must be (must be) near on impossible to achieve? We would see discrepancies in continuity, obvious mismatched video timelines, discrepancies in light, backgrounds, clouds and that thing which subconsciously sends a signal to your common sense that demands you look at it as suspicious or your "gut feeling" is totally gone.



ufo-mothership-recorded-live-dropping-ufos.



It never even registered from the start which is awesome. In fact as soon as I saw about 15 or 20 seconds of the UFO Mothership video - I was probably leaning towards this been real from then on because it got better and better. I saw nothing to arouse my suspicions at all. That's pretty much unprecedented if I'm being honest. 

The beginning of the video shows us a string of UFOs coming out in both directions from the UFO Mothership and the Mothership stays the same size! That's unprecedented definitely, also as most people know "it goes against physics", it goes against everything that we know about limits on reality. It shouldn't be able to release multiple same size objects s as the Mothership - from within itself, its impossible. It's not the Dr Who time travel Tardis.


Unless we have been pushed in to another dimension or reality where 30 people can fit inside a Mini Cooper vehicle then this just shouldn't be possible!













It looks like lights or Orbs which look like everyone of these anomalous entities are all connected by either a line or a tether?




Video/images by Alfredo Carrillo and Pedro Hernandez.


There's more to this video than meets the eye. I'm not sure that everyone's going to be on board because they'll probably need more information about what actually happened there?


The lack of information though really "useful though it is" doesn't compare to the actual evidence because words can distort the truth or evidence.

Please leave a comment or check us out on Facebook #ufosightingsfootage 


Source Alfredo Carrillo.
Source Pedro Hernandez. 
Source Reference Yohanan Diaz.

Ancient Lost Civilization Underneath 1 Mile Of Frozen Ice In Antarctica

Shock claim that there's a massive ancient civilization which lies "frozen in time" beneath one mile of Antarctic ice and it could even be Atlantis, that was the heading of this amazing post I read. The lost, secret and unique "hidden civilized city" that's completely flash frozen underneath Antarctica, according to new and shocking claims from a scientist. The huge Antarctica continent is a wintry icy mass, and is currently only inhabited by scientific researchers and penguins thanks to its freezing temperatures. Also, there is a US military presence but are disguised as scientists!


So there's an under-ice city, this is history changing and absolutely timeline changing. I always post about our ancient ancestors and timelines because it only takes on insignificant change or minute misunderstanding (as scientists would put it) for everything that we know and have "learned" to throw it all in to doubt. This is one such instance that we need to explore.



Image Credit/David Demaret: An artist's view of what an ancient civilization could look like on the continent of Antarctica.

Rumors of a hidden city have been floating about for years, as conspiracy theorists and even some scientists claim the freezing continent is actually the home of the legendary Lost City of Atlantis. One scientific theory claims that once upon a time Antarctica was ice-free and home to an ancient civilization.

Athanasius Kircher's map of Atlantis, placing it in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, from Mundus Subterraneus 1669, published in Amsterdam. The map is oriented with south at the top.

The pictures, taken using remote sensing photography for NASA's Operation IceBridge mission to Antarctica, show what online sleuths believe could be a city. Google Earth images also appeared to show a pyramid poking out of the tundra, with enthusiasts claiming that it is proof humanity once lived in the area and built a man-made structure.


The fascinating discovery comes just weeks after scientists revealed the Earth could be heading for another mini ice age caused by the Sun "going blank".


Conspiracy theorists went wild earlier this year when a video claiming to be from the lost city emerged. It appeared to show extensive ancient ruins hidden in the ice, and was a video supposedly 'left behind' by a California TV crew who have been missing since 2002. Archaeologist Jonathan Gray claimed that the US government is trying to block the video from being seen because it reveals there is a "massive archaeological dig under way two miles beneath the ice".

IceBridge is the largest airborne survey of Earth's polar ice ever flown.

But that's not the wildest claim - with several online websites claiming that there is a city in Antarctica and Hitler knew about it, making it a secret Nazi base which has been the subject to ridicule and made the butt of jokes the world over but there's actually truth to it, but that's another story for another day. The wild claims state that the Nazis claimed an area of Antarctica as German territory and sent an expedition there...

Artists impression of a doorway in to a secret underground civilization in Antarctica.

Artists impression of a doorway to Atlantis, which is claimed to be the lost city underneath Antarctica.

They then allegedly mapped the area and discovered a network of rivers and caves, one of which led to a large geothermal lake. A city-sized base was built there, called "Base 22 or New Berlin", and supposedly was home to not only Nazis but also the Illuminati. However, things get even weirder, with suggestions that the Germans discovered abandoned alien technology OR contacted aliens, and used it to make super weapons.


And some people think the rumored base still exists, with the Germans, aliens, and the Illuminati planning to launch a New World Order from it. In October, explorers discovered the remnants of a secret Nazi base hidden deep in the Arctic, just 600 miles from the North Pole. Whatever beings may be inhabiting the base, they'll need to make sure to wrap up warm - with one unlucky Antarctic explorer revealing this week he is suffering from the painful-sounding condition Polar Penis.

Link to The Sun post.
The Antarctica conspiracy theories are very, very solid as far as evidence and proof is concerned because there's images, videos and other first hand accounts and witness testimonies and even people willing to and passing lie detectors and swear an oath in court. This is all circumstantial but then there's the people who are working for and have worked for NASA science labs, subsidiary companies working on behalf of NASA also and universities all of which have access to Antarctica. For me there's way to much evidence to support the theories.

The Kenneth Arnold UFO Sighting Mt. Rainier Washington, June 24, 1947

Here's a quick outline about the Kenneth Arnold Flying Saucer incident which is an historically accurate Flying Saucer case - which is as follows:


Originating Organisation: Project Blue Book.

The Kenneth Arnold real UFO sighting occurred on June 24, 1947, when Idaho private pilot Kenneth Arnold claimed that he saw a string of nine, shiny unidentified flying objects (possibly the same as the modern Tic Tac UFOs) flying past Mount Rainier at speeds that Arnold estimated at a minimum of 1,200 miles an hour.

Taken in to account - this ties in with the speeds reported by the US Navy pilots when they chased the tumbling UFOs. You know, just as a comparison.



Related Post:


This pilot's a trained observer. Just like any modern day pilot if not more so because technology has taken over a lot of the controls.

This UFO incident was featured in many local and national newspapers!












The Kenneth Arnold Sighting, June 24, 1947 Former East Oregonian reporter Bill Bequette of Kennewick poses (below) with a copy of the East Oregonian from 1947 at his home in June 1997.




The-news-reporter-that-Kenneth-Arnold-talked-to-about-his-UFO-sighting.



Bill Bequette is the reporter who first published the real story of this amazing UFO encounter - as told to him by pilot Kenneth Arnold, on June 25, 1947.

Credit: MITCHELL ZACHS, EAST OREGONIAN ASSOCIATED PRESS.

The Kenneth Arnold case really did give way to a huge influx of UFO sightings from then on. But the US Government were very quick to cover up as many as they could and to make as many as they could, just go away!


But why? Is it a case of, cover up them all just to cover up one real story...



Photo-of-the-model-disk-Arnold-saw.


Below is pilot Kenneth Arnold holding his drawing of the actual UFO which he really did see.


Kenneth-Arnold-showing-a-photo-of-the-disk-he-saw-while-flying-a-plane.



It was almost like an "ACCESS DENIED" but slapped on to everything and anything - to do with Aliens and UFOs.












But things have been changing (slowly at first but gradually getting more acceptable) and are changing now, for sure, because of...

The US Navy UFO incidents.




mt-rainier-in-washington-courtesy-craig-romano.


Above: Mt Rainier, Washington. (Sunrise, Courtesy of Craig Romano).


This was the first post - War sighting in the United States that garnered nationwide news coverage and is credited with being the first of the modern era of real UFO sightings, Including numerous reported sightings over the next two to three weeks.

Arnold’s description of the objects also led to the press quickly coining the terms flying Saucer and Flying Disc, as popular descriptive terms for UFOs. During a refuelling stop in Pendleton, Oregon, Arnold described his experience to the East Oregonian newspaper.

Arnold’s real story, disseminated by the Associated Press, was headline news across the country. He was dismissed as "seeing things" as usual by an Air Force investigation (lol) who later concluded Arnold had seen a mirage or disc - shaped clouds. Can you believe this guy, seriously!

Here it is layman's term's:



  • Pilot was there, who saw the Flying Disks.
  • Government was not there, says the pilot is seeing things.


I know who I believe. How can the Government determine what the pilot actually saw based on the pilots own testimonial? If you want a cover up 101 type scenario then bookmark this page because this whole thing is a cover up.

Kenneth Arnold died in 1984.


RIP.


There was an influx of UFO sightings the likes of which hadn't been seen before and the term Flying Saucer was quickly established.

Arnold said he saw a bright light that afternoon, looked north and saw the nine objects - each about 50 feet across and all of them roughly circular, except for one that was crescent-shaped. He said he watched them for about 2 minutes until they disappeared over Oregon at speeds approaching 1,400 mph.

But, did you know this titbit of info:

The term "Flying Saucer" had been in use since 1890 to describe a clay pigeon shooting target, which resembles a classic UFO shape. Who knew it would later become the terminology used to describe an Alien craft?












Someone absolutely did!
Although Arnold never specifically used the term "Flying Saucer", he was quoted at the time saying the shape of the objects he saw was like a "Saucer", "Disc", or "pie-plate", and several years later it was added.

He had also said that "the objects moved like saucers skipping across the water."

Both the terms Flying Saucer and Flying Disc were used commonly and interchangeably in the media until the early 1950's.



Claimed-to-be-the-first-UFO-photograph.


Reportedly the first sensational picture (above) of the mysterious objects popularly known as Flying Saucers, this photograph is reproduced from an issue of TeenAge Times in Dublin, Ireland, on March 25, 1950.

(Gamma - Keystone via Getty Images, above).


UFO-sighting-in-Sheffield-in-1962.


A photo released by the CIA shows Unidentified Flying Object's (UFOs) over the skies of Sheffield, England on March 4, 1962.

(Keystone - France/Gamma - Keystone - Getty Images above).


In fact, the term UFO was invented in 1952. To try to reflect the wider diversity of shapes being seen. However, unknown Saucer - like Object's where still reported.

Such as in the widely publicised 2006 sighting over Chicago - O'Hare airport.

Source... Wikipedia, of course. Music, Dark Skies of Doom, Lumen5. Kenneth Arnold


Source Time.
Source O'Hare International Airport UFO Sighting 2006 Wikipedia.
Source ABC News.

The Full Video Of Real Metallic UFO At The ISS

There's a real chance that we're witnessing history in the making right here with this amazing spacecraft recorded on the ISS Live TV Feed.


This is one of those epic moments when you know the people at NASA "must" of been misleading the public! This spacecraft is tagging along with the ISS and it's slowly edging forward, trying to overtake it is what this looks like to me?

It happened on Friday 21st Feb 2020.



Real-UFO-in-front-of-the-ISS-is-tagging-along

Credit UStream, ISS Live Stream












Then we see the spacecraft slowly descend in front of the ISS cameras and now the world is looking, it get's right on the edge of the cameras lens and it then starts to emanate a very strong light. This light is so strong that it begins to look like a cross because of the Sun's glare on the lens.



All of a sudden, this amazing "grey metallic" craft hen speeds off but going forward, away from the ISS which makes this craft look like it's getting smaller. This is an epic discovery and I bet you anything you like, The Eiffel Tower if you like - that this "thing" is been talked about by US military officials, UK and European space experts alike whom are all high up in the space command!




Related post:



Yes, that's just how good this is! Guys, you need o let it sink in just what it entails if Aliens really do existing? Also, it looks like we've let them get away to contact their own kind...












Just what does that one mean? It means that now whatever intelligence they had or was gathering, i looks like they have it all and are now on their merry way to deliver said bounty But to who? When, why and what's the results of this information transfer going to be? Is it going to aid them in an attack?

Is it going to aid them in helping us clear up our atmosphere or is this information going o tell them that they should invest their time and efforts elsewhere in the universe?



Close-up-image-showing-the-UFO-near-the-ISS


Somebody at NASA must explain this to the public. Somebody at NASA needs to stop with the spouting off about weather balloons and swamp gas. We aren't stupid, we wasn't born on Mars and we need answers because all signs point to Extraterrestrials existing.












I'm just as curious as the next person and i'm just as cautious as the next person but I am not just as stupid as the next person and I know what this is. It was taken off the International Space Station's live TV feed.


Here's the NASA UStream Live Feed:







Full video is from Live ISS Stream and the video there has had well over 6K views already. This is big, this UFO or "spacecraft" whichever you wish to call it is massive in terms of Ufology, proof, Real evidence and real proof to support the theory that life indeed exists elsewhere in the universe and yes, we are not alone.



I-tried-to-bring-out-as-many-features-as-I-can


The image above is a close up of the spacecraft as I could and at the same time keep the definition? I'm not good with manipulating images and so it is what i is guys, I thought I'd at least try to bring out it's features and his is the best as I could do? When you watch the video, the full 22 minuets is really off the charts as far as disclosure goes because of the content and the obvious acknowledgement of NASA.

I hope you liked the post, it is what I believe to be the "smoking gun" as far as proof goes. I hope you feel that way too...


Source Credit UStream Live ISS Feed.
Source UFO Sightings Footage Vimeo Channel.

Amazing UFO Flies Very Close To The ISS In Full View

I must be on to the number 10 thousand video showing UFOs at the ISS or by some way shape or from, related to NASA.



Here you see a UFO light Orb or sphere (which ever you prefer) going straight past the ISS and it curves to the left and it is definitely some strange going on's.




What does NASA say about this? NASA says nothing as usual, NASA doesn't want to get it's feet wet in the pool of truth!






UFO-flying-around-the-ISS-is-a-sphere-or-an-orb

Image Credit NASA recorded January 5th 2020


All the majority of UFO believers want is for NASA just to acknowledge that UFOs do in fact keep on buzzing the International Space Station.












It would help a lot of people in more than one way? There's the mental health aspect because some people feel crazy for believing that they saw a UFO on the live feed.



UFO-at-the-ISS-moving-around-been-filmed-by-NASA

Image Credit NASA recorded January 5th 2020

Some people feel that when NASA cuts the live feed, they're doing so for other "alternative reasons" and not because of technical difficulties. If the ISS had the exact same amount of technical difficulties as the live feed does, then it would Earth bound but not under any control, it would be plummeting to Earth because it's having thousands of technical issues.




Post Link:



2-silver-metallic-UFOs-visit-the-ISS-(related-post)



The above image is about as amazing as it gets in terms of obvious UFOs circling the shuttle. NASA in their oblivious manner just deny it's even there at All.


That's just common sense that this amount of live feed outages - just doesn't happen in real life. It's NASA for heavens sake, they have more investment, funding and technology than you could fathom!












NASA has more scientists, engineers and software designers, producers, fixers and epic developers that for me personally - that's why I cannot accept the notion, the messages that it's continuously having technical difficulties.

Sorry, but I can't accept that the same difficulties keep on happening time after time, right at the exact same time a UFO or let's just say "an object" appears on the live feed.

I do not buy it one bit, in fact I won't ever believe it one bit. I don't believe in coincidences and it's because of such things like this, as to why I don't believe in coincidences.

I believe in reasons for such things like a live stream going offline or experiencing technical difficulties but the same one, the very same technical difficulty occurring time and time again, well... I'd have to be a first time viewer to believe the explanation for it going down.

Once you've seen the same thing occur again and again it's time to ask questions. It's exactly the same thing for these objects appearing as well. They always turn up, it goes offline and it comes back on but NASA don't say anything but the per written explanation on the offline screen message.

That's what I mean by the "same explanation" every time. They don't add anything to it other than that. So by it's definition, nothing changes as for the reasons of the outage!

I might be a bit picky, but I'm also aware that people need answers so casting the net wide and far, I understand that everyone is seeing things differently from one person to the next. I'm trying to ask the many questions and answer the many questions that comes with many different perspectives?

So, from one post it will look tedious but it also is asking as many questions as I can possibly think of right now as I write this blog post.

See, my blog post is not a prepared written speech by an editor. It's just little old me, asking questions that I want to ask. I'm showing the UFO video that I want answers to - instead of showing you a T.shirt which an editor is trying to sell on behalf of some massive T.shirt outlet!












If I miss a question then we cover it in the comments section or on social media. That's how my blog works. I look in to a UFO video as humanly possible to me and then I deliver it here. I write off the top of my head and I usually prattle on but I always get what I want out.







Source NASA Live TV.
Source Express.
Source ET Data Base.

Guy In Rural Scotland Photographs Epic UFO

Very convincing UFO story from Scotland in the UK by a guy called John Macdonald(65) of Perthshire who has photographic evidence.




I'm getting behind this amazing UK UFO sighting because it's so consistent from start to finish and the evidence is so clear and the sound is different.





Scottish-man-takes-amazing-close-up-photograph-of-UFO

Image Credit: John Macdonald













UFOs don't usually get photographed this close and if they do, it's usually a CGI piece.



Related post:




Consistency could still me manufactured and I get that, consistency is only what someone says and therefore it's not evidence as such, but it's from this consistency that the gut feeling comes from. For me it is, in this case.


Photographing a UFO isn't the first thing on your mind when your thrust in to a UFO event or incident and this is why a lot of UFO photos are blurry.


The eye witnesses to UFOs just do not consider focusing in to the Flying Saucer or Orb, energy sphere or UFO! That's the reality of it. I hear a lot of complaining about blurry UFO photos but if you stop to think "why" is the photo blurry, it becomes obvious really quickly.


Quote:


“It’s a spacecraft of some sort. I don’t know whether I frightened it or not with the flash of the camera because in the beat of heart it was gone” he states. “My jeep is quite noisy, but this sounded like a thousand hoovers.
When I phoned my friend, who’s a shepherd, he said ‘don’t worry about it, we get this up here quite a lot.' I always thought there was something out there, but have never seen anything until now. There is no doubt in my mind. I know what I saw.”
                                                             John Macdonald



He (John) was only about 70 yards away from the UFO or Flying Saucer and that means the photographs he took was very clear, but John fears that he frightened or spooked the UFO off as it zipped away after the flashes from the camera had gone off.













The witness was in the right place at the right minute, is it destiny or is it coincidence that he was there when he was?



John-Macdonald-shows-an-image-of-the-UFO-which-he-witnessed

Image Credit: John Macdonald


Phoning his pal, he told him that he'd seen a UFO and got photos of it but the friend shocked him as he told John that it was normal as everyone seems them up there (meaning rural Scotland).











Then there's the noise, the amazingly loud noise which sounded like a thousand hoovers (carpet cleaners). If you can imagine this then you'd know just how loud this must be which actually goes right against the grain of "traditional UFO sightings" as normally they have no sounds?


Could this be a plane, Jet, helicopter, drone or secret stealth air craft?

Well, the latter is a definite no, because of the loud Hoover like sound's and the others mentioned are a definite no, because we have photographs showing the outline by the lights on the exterior of the craft.

A spokesman for the Civil Aviation Authority said:


“It’s possible to fly a drone in darkness, but you have to keep it in your line of sight at all times. “If you are flying something in darkness it is difficult to keep it in your visual line of sight.”



As far as I'm concerned, this is not a drone and I've already said about my thoughts on any other possible candidates. This is a real Unidentified Flying Object" but only for the minute...


Please share and leave us your comments, it's much appreciated.

Source Disclose.TV.

Same Silver Flying Saucer In 1985 NASA Photo And Released UFO Video

Astronaut Photo STS61B-33-12 is the image which has brought me the confirmation I've been looking for, after many years of looking and researching UFOs.



Someone else has just found this (link below) whilst combing through the NASA image gallery from the 1985 Shuttle Atlantis STS image archive, on the eol.jsc.nasa website - which is a dot gov website.


A-close-up-of-the-Flying-Saucer-in-NASA-gallery.

Image Credits NASA:












The above image is the official NASA photo, it looks exactly like the one which was declassified and released by the Government?



Someone tried saying it's a satellite but it clearly shows a Flying Saucer and not a satellite. The satellite in question looks nothing like this disk, the other satellite has lights, aerials on it. This does not.



Map-of-where-the-UFO-sighting-took-place-in-space.



The map above shows approximately where the photograph was taken above Earth. Apparently though according to armchair experts this is a satellite? Let's not forget that this photograph was taken in 1985 on board the Shuttle Atlantis.

That's not a satellite (no way) as there's nothing to propel the craft, there's no solar cells, there's no place or a battery cell or a battery pack. It doesn't matter which angle you look at the supposed satellite from you could see other parts of it. This however is a disk.

There's no antennas, there's no communication systems, no solar panels, no blinking lights and come to think of it, there's no miniature thrusters to maneuver the so-called "satellite" in to position and in a safe orbit lol.



The-image-shows-the-UFO-satellite-as-it-is-in-space.



There you go, I now have full UFO disclosure for my own satisfaction - at least in my mind it's now a fact. In Ufology this is how most people make their beliefs. Most if not at least 95% of Ufology us faith for each individual who believes which is a determination based on what makes complete sense to him or her? We don't have the pleasure of a science backing Ufology, for that matter. But it's OK because we have the UAP's videos released by the US Navy.












I also found this schematic of what looks like a Flying Saucer. It has the very same profile as this same silver Flying Saucer in the 1985 NASA STS (image above). I believe the real proof is everywhere in the public domain but we just need to put it together? The top part of this drawing of the disk resembles the disk so good, it fits like a glove! Does that mean it is man made?



Schematic-showing-a-UFO-or-Flying-Saucer.



It is insane that this "proper squared off photo" did not get seen earlier whilst NASA was deleting and getting rid of (cover's up) the images which are important to mankind.

It makes me question if this is under the table so-to-speak UFO disclosure by NASA? That's called "soft disclosure".

Is the reason why NASA won't say publicly that Aliens exist, because they've already done it albeit in online images which there's millions and millions of images on the NASA servers! We might just need to look through every single one of them?

NASA has been publishing "bona fide" legitimate UFO photos since blooming 1985 (if not before) because that's when this was taken.

So I bet scientists at NASA labs are always laughing saying things to each other - stuff like "One day someone will see it" or if only they stop blabbing at the mouth and just go and have a good thorough look in the image archives.

People will see that we've published UFO evidence already and then the public will know our stance because we've posted the photos.

It's probably an inside joke at NASA where all the scientists know it's a UFO, and they know that anyone can go see it and they "can't direct us to it".

Because then they'll be kinda admitting it publicly - whereas if they just leave it for Joe public to find it will look like this. And it will keep the air of mystery surrounding UFO and Alien disclosure. Plausible deniability I think they call it?

BUT - 

I was racking my brain last night and I know I've wrote a post about something very, very similar lol before. Like very specifically similar in design, look and size and color. 

So I went through my catalog of news articles, blog posts and social media posts (2000+ blog posts) as I was sure I wrote about a verified UFO sighting (Yes verified) and then I remembered!

UPDATED SAT, 28TH MARCH 2020.

It's near enough the same looking UFO, Flying Saucer as the Navy had admitted to. Not the Tic Tac UFO, but the other one (link is below in the source).

This is the one:



The-Flying-Saucer-which-the-US-Navy-admitted-to.


The space photo of the silver Disk and this recent image released by the Navy look very similar don't you think?

Scott Waring actually did a UFO YouTube video (below) of this epic find on the beginning of January 2020.












Here is the video showing us the so called satellite from 1985:






Date taken 1985.11.27

Time taken 07:52:34 GMT

Spacecraft altitude 190 nautical miles.


Source eol.jsc.nasa.gov.
Source Video of UFO Tracked on Camera By Military.
Source UFO Sightings Daily Scott Waring.
Source Gateway To Astronaut Photography of Earth: Image STS61B-33-12 NASA Archive.

Guy Stops On Highway To Film Huge UFO

Here is a UFO video which has me thinking it could absolutely be real, but as a sceptic i'm not sure... Purportedly caught on camera on February 11th, 2011 over Sao Paulo in Brazil.



It's because I haven't seen anything remotely like this before ever and that's why I can't fully get behind this UFO sighting but it's intriguing and very interesting?





UFO-sighting-over-Sao-Paulo-in-Brazil-in-the-clouds.


For me, nothing's ever come close to been "a possibly real UFO" looking like this and that's why I had to do a post on this to get your opinions?












I instantly thought this wasn't real as soon as I got to the part where the UFO disappears and changes it's form. It changed to a very different Alien looking shape altogether (was that cloud cover though).

And seeing the electric blue flash and then it becoming an Orb of light - then becoming two Orbs of light "WOW" that absolutely made me not believe!



Related UFO post:


But the eye witness reaction is throwing me off big time, what's your opinion on the eye witnesses reactions? Can anyone understand what language they're speaking - also "what they're - saying" as this would help a lot in confirming this UFO video?

Images from the video:




The direction that the UFO or Orb takes when it becomes an Orb of light and splits in to two other light Orbs - which is very convoluted if this is a trick.














So because it's a very complicated UFO if it is a fake and why would someone go to all these lengths to fake something so complicated and that's also why it possibly could be real?

The amazing electric blue flash (above) before the UFO vanishes.


Credit Google Map, Sao Paulo Brazil.




Image Credits @UfoSaoPaulo Twitter.
But up until that point I was convinced this was a real UFO video and that's because of the eye witnesses obvious "real" reaction.

I truly believe that something was there and that something was being recorded on camera "but" what that thing was I reckon we'll never know or the eye witness needs to come forward and testify that what happened was real?












Here is the UFO video:





Video credit @UfoSaoPaulo Twitter.


Even the UFO co-eye-witness to this (we can clearly hear another mans voice) could come forward and verify what we are seeing in this astounding UFO/shape shifting video is real!

If that happens I couldn't tell you but I hope that it's a possibility for the sake of Ufology and as the video has me on the fence, I'm pretty sure there will be other people on the fence but then there will be staunch non-believers and vise a versa.

Please share this post and comment on it, if your an expert and wish to analyse this and leave a comment then please do so. You could contact us by messaging us through our Facebook page, thank you.

The source of this amazing UFO video is from Twitter user @UfoSaoPaulo #ovnis #ufo (link in source).

Buzzfeed voted this UFO sighting as number 1 as the most convincing UFO sighting.

Here's the link to that post.

Source UfoSaoPaulo Twitter.

Popular Post's

Popular Post's All time