Amazing UFO Flies Very Close To The ISS In Full View

I must be on to the number 10 thousand video showing UFOs at the ISS or by some way shape or from, related to NASA.

Here you see a UFO light Orb or sphere (which ever you prefer) going straight past the ISS and it curves to the left and it is definitely some strange going on's.

What does NASA say about this? NASA says nothing as usual, NASA doesn't want to get it's feet wet in the pool of truth!


Image Credit NASA recorded January 5th 2020

All the majority of UFO believers want is for NASA just to acknowledge that UFOs do in fact keep on buzzing the International Space Station.

It would help a lot of people in more than one way? There's the mental health aspect because some people feel crazy for believing that they saw a UFO on the live feed.


Image Credit NASA recorded January 5th 2020

Some people feel that when NASA cuts the live feed, they're doing so for other "alternative reasons" and not because of technical difficulties. If the ISS had the exact same amount of technical difficulties as the live feed does, then it would Earth bound but not under any control, it would be plummeting to Earth because it's having thousands of technical issues.

Post Link:


The above image is about as amazing as it gets in terms of obvious UFOs circling the shuttle. NASA in their oblivious manner just deny it's even there at All.

That's just common sense that this amount of live feed outages - just doesn't happen in real life. It's NASA for heavens sake, they have more investment, funding and technology than you could fathom!

NASA has more scientists, engineers and software designers, producers, fixers and epic developers that for me personally - that's why I cannot accept the notion, the messages that it's continuously having technical difficulties.

Sorry, but I can't accept that the same difficulties keep on happening time after time, right at the exact same time a UFO or let's just say "an object" appears on the live feed.

I do not buy it one bit, in fact I won't ever believe it one bit. I don't believe in coincidences and it's because of such things like this, as to why I don't believe in coincidences.

I believe in reasons for such things like a live stream going offline or experiencing technical difficulties but the same one, the very same technical difficulty occurring time and time again, well... I'd have to be a first time viewer to believe the explanation for it going down.

Once you've seen the same thing occur again and again it's time to ask questions. It's exactly the same thing for these objects appearing as well. They always turn up, it goes offline and it comes back on but NASA don't say anything but the per written explanation on the offline screen message.

That's what I mean by the "same explanation" every time. They don't add anything to it other than that. So by it's definition, nothing changes as for the reasons of the outage!

I might be a bit picky, but I'm also aware that people need answers so casting the net wide and far, I understand that everyone is seeing things differently from one person to the next. I'm trying to ask the many questions and answer the many questions that comes with many different perspectives?

So, from one post it will look tedious but it also is asking as many questions as I can possibly think of right now as I write this blog post.

See, my blog post is not a prepared written speech by an editor. It's just little old me, asking questions that I want to ask. I'm showing the UFO video that I want answers to - instead of showing you a T.shirt which an editor is trying to sell on behalf of some massive T.shirt outlet!

If I miss a question then we cover it in the comments section or on social media. That's how my blog works. I look in to a UFO video as humanly possible to me and then I deliver it here. I write off the top of my head and I usually prattle on but I always get what I want out.

Source NASA Live TV.
Source Express.
Source ET Data Base.

Guy In Rural Scotland Photographs Epic UFO

Very convincing UFO story from Scotland in the UK by a guy called John Macdonald(65) of Perthshire who has photographic evidence.

I'm getting behind this amazing UK UFO sighting because it's so consistent from start to finish and the evidence is so clear and the sound is different.


Image Credit: John Macdonald

UFOs don't usually get photographed this close and if they do, it's usually a CGI piece.

Related post:

Consistency could still me manufactured and I get that, consistency is only what someone says and therefore it's not evidence as such, but it's from this consistency that the gut feeling comes from. For me it is, in this case.

Photographing a UFO isn't the first thing on your mind when your thrust in to a UFO event or incident and this is why a lot of UFO photos are blurry.

The eye witnesses to UFOs just do not consider focusing in to the Flying Saucer or Orb, energy sphere or UFO! That's the reality of it. I hear a lot of complaining about blurry UFO photos but if you stop to think "why" is the photo blurry, it becomes obvious really quickly.


“It’s a spacecraft of some sort. I don’t know whether I frightened it or not with the flash of the camera because in the beat of heart it was gone” he states. “My jeep is quite noisy, but this sounded like a thousand hoovers.
When I phoned my friend, who’s a shepherd, he said ‘don’t worry about it, we get this up here quite a lot.' I always thought there was something out there, but have never seen anything until now. There is no doubt in my mind. I know what I saw.”
                                                             John Macdonald

He (John) was only about 70 yards away from the UFO or Flying Saucer and that means the photographs he took was very clear, but John fears that he frightened or spooked the UFO off as it zipped away after the flashes from the camera had gone off.

The witness was in the right place at the right minute, is it destiny or is it coincidence that he was there when he was?


Image Credit: John Macdonald

Phoning his pal, he told him that he'd seen a UFO and got photos of it but the friend shocked him as he told John that it was normal as everyone seems them up there (meaning rural Scotland).

Then there's the noise, the amazingly loud noise which sounded like a thousand hoovers (carpet cleaners). If you can imagine this then you'd know just how loud this must be which actually goes right against the grain of "traditional UFO sightings" as normally they have no sounds?

Could this be a plane, Jet, helicopter, drone or secret stealth air craft?

Well, the latter is a definite no, because of the loud Hoover like sound's and the others mentioned are a definite no, because we have photographs showing the outline by the lights on the exterior of the craft.

A spokesman for the Civil Aviation Authority said:

“It’s possible to fly a drone in darkness, but you have to keep it in your line of sight at all times. “If you are flying something in darkness it is difficult to keep it in your visual line of sight.”

As far as I'm concerned, this is not a drone and I've already said about my thoughts on any other possible candidates. This is a real Unidentified Flying Object" but only for the minute...

Please share and leave us your comments, it's much appreciated.

Source Disclose.TV.

Silver Flying Saucer In 1985 NASA Photo And Its Epic

Astronaut Photo STS61B-33-12 is the image which has brought me the confirmation I've been looking for, after many years of looking and researching UFOs.

Someone else has just found this (link below) whilst combing through the NASA image gallery from the 1985 Shuttle Atlantis STS image archive, on the eol.jsc.nasa website - which is a dot gov website.


Image Credits NASA:

The above image is the official NASA photo and it clearly shows a Flying Saucer and not a satellite.


The map above shows approximately where the photograph was taken above Earth. Apparently this is a satellite? Let's not forget that this photograph was taken in 1985 on board the Shuttle Atlantis.

That's not a satellite (no way) as there's nothing to propel the craft, there's no solar cells, there's no place or a battery cell or a battery pack.

There's no antennas, there's no communication systems and come to think of it, there's no thrusters to maneuver the "satellite" in commas lol.


There you go, I now have full UFO disclosure for my own satisfaction - at least in my mind it's now a fact. In Ufology this is how most people make their beliefs. We don't have the pleasure of a government backing or science, for that matter.

I also found this schematic of what looks like a Flying Saucer. It has the very same profile as the silver Flying Saucer in the 1985 NASA STS (image above). I believe the real proof is everywhere in the public domain but we just need to put it together?


It is insane that this "proper squared off photo" did not get seen earlier whilst NASA deletes, gets rid of or otherwise cover's up the images which are important to mankind.

It makes me question if this is under the table so-to-speak UFO disclosure by NASA? Is the reason why NASA won't say publicly that Aliens exist because they've already done it!

NASA has published "bona fide" legitimate UFO photos since blooming 1985 (if not before) because that's when this was taken.

So I bet scientists at NASA labs are always laughing saying things to each other stuff like "One day someone will see it" or if only they stop blabbing at the mouth and just look in the image archives.

People will see what we've published UFO evidence already and then the public will know our stance because we've posted the photos - nobody else, us, NASA!

It's probably an inside joke at NASA where all the scientists know it's a UFO, and they know that anyone can go see it and they "can't direct us to it".

Because then they'll be kinda admitting it publicly - whereas if they just leave it for Joe public to find it will look like this. And it will keep the air of mystery surrounding UFO and Alien disclosure. Plausible deniability I think they call it?

BUT - 

I was racking my brain last night and I know I've wrote a post about something very, very similar lol before. Like very specifically similar in design, look and size and color. 

So I went through my catalog of news articles, blog posts and social media posts (2000+ blog posts) as I was sure I wrote about a verified UFO sighting (Yes verified) and then I remembered!

It's near enough the same looking UFO, Flying Saucer as the Navy had admitted to. Not the Tic Tac UFO, but the other one (link is below in the source).

This is the one:


The space photo and this recent image released by the Navy look very similar don't you think?

Scott Waring actually did a UFO YouTube video (below) of this epic find on the beginning of January 2020.

Here is the video showing us the so called satellite from 1985:

Date taken 1985.11.27

Time taken 07:52:34 GMT

Spacecraft altitude 190 nautical miles.

Source Video of UFO Tracked on Camera By Military.
Source UFO Sightings Daily Scott Waring.
Source Gateway To Astronaut Photography of Earth: Image STS61B-33-12 NASA Archive.

Guy Stops On Highway To Film Huge UFO

Here is a UFO video which has me thinking it could absolutely be real, but as a sceptic i'm not sure... Purportedly caught on camera on February 11th, 2011 over Sao Paulo in Brazil.

It's because I haven't seen anything remotely like this before ever and that's why I can't fully get behind this UFO sighting but it's intriguing and very interesting?


For me, nothing's ever come close to been "a possibly real UFO" looking like this and that's why I had to do a post on this to get your opinions?

I instantly thought this wasn't real as soon as I got to the part where the UFO disappears and changes it's form. It changed to a very different Alien looking shape altogether (was that cloud cover though).

And seeing the electric blue flash and then it becoming an Orb of light - then becoming two Orbs of light "WOW" that absolutely made me not believe!

Related UFO post:

But the eye witness reaction is throwing me off big time, what's your opinion on the eye witnesses reactions? Can anyone understand what language they're speaking - also "what they're - saying" as this would help a lot in confirming this UFO video?

Images from the video:

The direction that the UFO or Orb takes when it becomes an Orb of light and splits in to two other light Orbs - which is very convoluted if this is a trick.

So because it's a very complicated UFO if it is a fake and why would someone go to all these lengths to fake something so complicated and that's also why it possibly could be real?

The amazing electric blue flash (above) before the UFO vanishes.

Credit Google Map, Sao Paulo Brazil.

Image Credits @UfoSaoPaulo Twitter.
But up until that point I was convinced this was a real UFO video and that's because of the eye witnesses obvious "real" reaction.

I truly believe that something was there and that something was being recorded on camera "but" what that thing was I reckon we'll never know or the eye witness needs to come forward and testify that what happened was real?

Here is the UFO video:

Video credit @UfoSaoPaulo Twitter.

Even the UFO co-eye-witness to this (we can clearly hear another mans voice) could come forward and verify what we are seeing in this astounding UFO/shape shifting video is real!

If that happens I couldn't tell you but I hope that it's a possibility for the sake of Ufology and as the video has me on the fence, I'm pretty sure there will be other people on the fence but then there will be staunch non-believers and vise a versa.

Please share this post and comment on it, if your an expert and wish to analyse this and leave a comment then please do so. You could contact us by messaging us through our Facebook page, thank you.

The source of this amazing UFO video is from Twitter user @UfoSaoPaulo #ovnis #ufo (link in source).

Buzzfeed voted this UFO sighting as number 1 as the most convincing UFO sighting.

Here's the link to that post.

Source UfoSaoPaulo Twitter.

Reptilian Eyes Exposed on CNN News Channel

So OK, I've always been on the fence about anyone been able to claim they are Reptilian or an Alien outright or that they think they're part Alien or even a clone? But...

Some people have suggested they where from a top secret cloning program and they have implants, can read peoples minds yadda, yadda. It's just words.


Image credit's CNN

That's all fine and well, it's entirely up to the individual to believe in whatever they want to believe in (it's their choice) and I do not have a problem with that.


Spectacular or what!

It's just not something I subscribe to because "it's only words" and a good story to tell someone or a group of people around a camp fire.

Related post:

There's nothing in way of tangible evidence backing up their claims - nothing by way of a team of people around them agreeing or saying that they know about it - nothing but a grandiose word play. It's maybe a little blunt but it's the truth.

But then there's this video below (which can be identified through CNN's archive...)

Video credit CNN/Blue_Beam_Project

It's like the RH Negative blood lines are "only" suggested there might be a link to Aliens, that's if Aliens exist - right?

I truly hope that Aliens and UFOs are confirmed, like science fact confirmed - one day, because I have researched this genre extensively and put a lot of time in to this because I have hope and I love it.


It's interesting, it's fascinating, it's got massive implications and everyone would benefit from it especially if they're technologically advanced?

I have hope that one day, we'll all see that there's much, much more to life than just Earth and all it's constraints.

One day, it will be normal to fly to the Moon. One day it will be normal to get in a vehicle without driving and take a nap and wake up in Germany or wherever's been put in to the autopilot system.

But, I come across this short video not long ago and I uploaded it to my Instagram channel and before long people was saying it is real, they saw the CNN news and it's the same etc.

It's the easiest way to verify i right? Just check the original footage against this footage and see if it actually happens in that footage from CNN also?

This is a post where i'm asking if anyone has got the original footage (I know it's a long leap) but i'm asking anyways:


Can anyone find the original footage for this CNN what looks like an interview and it looks like it was live and in a studio with more than just one person (the potential Reptilian)?

In the Blue Beam Project Instagram (link below) it says how to spot Reptiles, how to identify them and other information on Reptilian hybrids.

Source CNN News Channel.
Source Blue_Beam_Project Instagram.
Reference Reptile Woman Instagram.
Reference Reptile Hybrids Pinterest.

Curious To Know If UFOs Are Near You

I came across this amazing infographic based on UFO sightings in the United States. This infographic has some of the best UFO sightings ever recorded and reported.

The whole UFO representation right here is awesome. If a UFO was reported and if it happened near where you live then it will be right here in this interactive infographic.


Image Suyash Singh

The graphics are provided by Tableau Public (link below) and was created "from the ground up" by an amazing data analyst called Suyash Singh. The data compiled was based on the public's growing confidence to report UFO sightings and events because there will not be any repercussions from anyone in their own workplace or from their friends!

It's based on 80 thousand submissions and divided in to days, time, shape and place and year. It's awesome!

Related post:

Their friends will now (more than likely) encourage them, you, me to report a UFO event - instead of ignoring it just a decade or so ago? Where friends would probably have that "horrified frown or stare" and the their eyes would roll and be that would be saying everything but without actually saying anything at all.


Image Canva Image Archive

Mr Singh noted that, among the observations he made about UFOs while working on the project, "It was very interesting to see that the number of UFO sightings recorded were at late night hours on the weekends; i.e., the drinking hours."

What's your take on this statement? It kinda means that he could of chose UFOs not because he believes in UFOs but rather that he chose it for the obvious easily obtainable and available statistics, like NUFORC or MUFON and UFO Stalker and many other places?

Check the link in the sources section at the bottom of this post to see if there was any UFO events in your own area over the last century? It's fascinating UFO information and maybe, just maybe the UFO that you saw, somebody else saw in your area also? If that happened please get in touch and leave us a message, thank you.

NUFORC was the place from where Mr Singh gathered his data research material and from which he gathered a whole centuries worth of Ufology gold. The interactive map he created is stunning.


Image Lubbock Lights History

This dataset which Mr Singh has compiled contains over 80,000 reports of UFO sightings over the last century. The basics of any research (I believe) is to have a credible source and NUFORC is just that. The UFO data or information is accurate to the eye witness and in no way, shape or form is it altered by NUFORC!

It is what it is and will be for well, forever...

The archive material will not change, it cannot change. With people referencing these statistics periodically and the relevant UFO cases therein.

It's like a *blockchain effect where if all the entries match up then they all say yes. Then it's accurate as opposed to one person changing the amount, lol.

In relative terms, it can't be changed now but keeping Ufology information in "just one place" is not good as it can be changed from the source.

That means everyone whom sources this is inherently wrong and then it becomes an unstoppable, misleading lie.

Source Tableau Public - Suyash Singh (profile).
Source Reference Illinois School of Information Sciences.
Source Reference Blockchain Wikipedia.
Images Suyash Sigh.

By design, a blockchain is resistant to modification of the data. It is "an open, distributed ledger that can record transactions between two parties efficiently and in a verifiable and permanent way". For use as a distributed ledger, a blockchain is typically managed by a peer-to-peer network collectively adhering to a protocol for inter-node communication and validating new blocks. Once recorded, the data in any given block cannot be altered retroactively without alteration of all subsequent blocks, which requires consensus of the network majority.

Ancient Alien Technology on Asteroid Eros

This is, in my view and my personal opinion that this marvelous artifact, damning evidence as it is though - I believe that this is of ancient Alien origin.

I say that because and here's the key detail for me and this assertion "it's not human technology".

There's lot's of strange and bizarre "plus weird" anomalies in space and if you probe just a little bit (no pun intended) you'll surprise yourself.

If this is anything else other than ancient technology then I will eat my hat. It's an official photo from NASA itself. It doesn't mean that NASA isn't censoring the photos - this 9ne could of been posted by mistake or because it was overlooked maybe? This wouldn't have been posted to their website if they was aware of this.


The link to the NASA image in their official archive is at the bottom of this page.

It's amazing to have the official image for you and not just a second hand copy from the Internet. Leaving this photo on the NASA website could be that they're trying to say it's no big deal or it's not Alien technology because see, we've posted it and not marked it as Alien technology.

If you look through the right NASA images gallery and check out the right archival video footage, taken by any of the space mission astronauts or by the astronauts body cameras - you'll find something that makes you think what was that?

You'll at least come away thinking: that should not be there or should it be there, or is that real?

I can guarantee you that it's real - as NASA or the ESA, JAXA, Roscosmos "Rosaviakosmos" etc aren't in the game of hoaxes, telling lies, playing pranks etc, (depending on whom you ask). And they definitely aren't in the business of staging fake events or incidents (again depending on whom you ask)?


Here is a short piece from Bending Reality about this:
Eros is a peanut - shaped asteroid and the first discovered and second largest near - Earth object with a mean-diameter of approximately 16.8 kilometers and named after the Greek God of Love, Eros.

Eros was one of the first asteroids visited by a spacecraft, the first one orbited, and the first one soft-landed on.

NASA spacecraft NEAR Shoemaker visited Eros first with a 1998 flyby and entered orbit around 2000, and on February 12, 2001, at the end of its mission, it landed on the asteroid’s surface using its maneuvering jets.

The main headline image of Eros, taken from the NEAR Shoemaker spacecraft on May 1, 2000, at an orbital altitude of 53 kilometers (33 miles), shows, according to NASA, a large rectangular boulder which is 45 meters across. But is it really a boulder or could it be a sort of ancient mining machine?


All image credits NASA.

So, do we have to take these things in to account as we receive them... you bet we do!

What doe's taking these things as we receive in to account, actually mean?

It means that we have to ask the obvious question(s):

Why do we have access to this obviously otherworldly material and is that deliberate?

Why are NASA and their cohorts taking no measures to prevent us from seeing these (in my view) obvious Alien anomalies?

  • Is this an ulterior motive at play?
  • Are they placed there to disclose that Aliens are real?
  • Is it a hint at the ultimate answer that Aliens exist?

Is there a different reason other than letting the public know that Aliens exist by way of artifacts, spacecrafts plus actual UFO footage and definite cover up's over the years?

There's lot's of questions but this one post is about the strange artifact on Eros.

It is looking like a gun?

It looks to me like a Alien artifact which suggests that it is a sort of defense tool?

It could be one of many things as who knows how to Identify Alien machines, tools and equipment?

It might be a oddly shaped drone or a craft to carry out surveillance of this valuable asteroid?

It might be a security device to ward off anyone trying to claim this asteroid?

Like an Alien version of planting the colony flag which was all the rage in yesteryear on Earth?

Touch this asteroid minions and you will be having difficult questions asked by your superior overlords.

That would be NASA.

Many, things come to mind about this artifact and the reason for that is because there is no way that it is a normal or natural formation on asteroid Eros!

It is intelligently looking and it looks to have a purpose.

What we humans would call a "object of concern" and probably declared "Top Secret" so that's why I say, is this a deliberate disclosure of an Alien artifact?

Give us your comments and leave us your thoughts, cheers.

Who owns this asteroid?

If Aliens exist, have they claimed it by putting an artifact on it - I ask this because just in case it turns out in the future that the asteroid is very valuable indeed... like gold for instance then who owns it.

Source NASA Official Image.
Source NASA. Source Bending Reality.

Ancient Paintings of UFOs

It really doesn't get anymore better than the actual "direct and tangible evidence of UFOs" which have been painted in to ancient pieces of amazing artwork's, by the leading artists of yesteryear.

We're talking about great artists such as the Flemish artist Aert De Gelder in his epic piece called "The Baptism of Christ" which is dated 1710 (image below bottom).

I've only picked a couple of my absolute favourite paintings to highlight the UFOs.


And then we have my all time personal favourite, the ancient piece of art called the "Glorification of the Eucharist" - painted by Bonaventura Salimbeni in 1600. This particular piece of wonderment and amazement is actually showing us all something which clearly shouldn't exist back then, let alone anyone thinking about it or painting it.

If you would like to "know for sure" or what it is supposed to be or what it was intended to be - which is the subject of many conspiracies - then here it is:

Related post:

Glorification of the Eucharist by Ventura Salimbeni - The so called UFO or “Sputnik” of Montalcino. This is actually the name so often used by certain sites, to refer to the object represented in the church of St. Peter in Montalcino (Siena, Italy), painted at the end of XVI century by Ventura (or Bonaventura) Salimbeni.

The sphere between the figures of the Holy Trinity, is not an UFO. That object, painted in many Trinity representations, is a symbol of the "Creation Globe", and in this particular painting contains the illustration of the Sun and the Moon.


There was nothing remotely in existence back then over 400 years ago - so to have this odd looking "thing" in his artwork is crazy right? Wrong, because now we know it was a symbol of the Moon and the Sun (which oddly enough should be 2 globes right)?


Sputnik the satellite with the famous painting the Glorification of the Eucharist.

So for me, i'm definitely not satisfied with the symbol theory or the creation globe explanation - at all! I believe that the artist was trying (and has succeeded) in conveying a message. Something else to think about its the antennas!

These are radio antennas and antennas do not and cannot be involved in the creation globe analogy! Do you know what these 2 antennas mean of which both man and God are holding? This is just another reason why I think the artist is conveying a message?

The most amazing and strangest thing about the whole affair this, how it "looks just like the very first satellite ever" put in to orbit (space) around the Earth which is called Sputnik!

This painting hangs above the altar at the Visoki Decani Monestary in Kosovo, Yugoslavia painted in 1350. There are clearly 2 UFOs or spaceships in the top corners of this epic painting. We even see that human like people was in these crafts.


Painted in 1710 by Flemish artist Aert De Gelder.

What was going through his head when he painted this amazing piece of history? That's definitely a spaceship with beaming lights coming from it.

I wonder if it really was a UFO sighting that he (the artist) had and knew it was a real Alien event or otherworldly event, so he then chose to hide it in a painting knowing that this is how history is created?

Just imagining this is incredible in itself but to then put it down on paper (so-to-speak) and have the world look at it, well that's unusual. History has proven how radio and satellites was prophecised in this one painting "alone".

These paintings are but a few of many, of my personal favourite pieces of ancient (and they really are ancient) artworks.

Source Commons.wikimedia.
Source Crystal Links.
Source Reference Ancient History Anomalies Pinterest.

Spaceship Found Parked On A Comet

Here's a very interesting and curious looking anomaly on Comet 67P from NASA archives.

There's an obvious weird and strange looking something on this rock flying through space, but what the heck is this?



I think this is an Alien spaceship caught by the ESA satellites visiting the Rosetta Comet 67P - but I'm sure somebody will say it's just a rock and offer nothing via way of an actual rational.

My rational is that it's colour in contrast to it's stark surroundings is very different (white even).

Related post:

The shape of this strange entity is very different from it's strange surroundings.

There's definite intelligence to the shape, like this was created using industry or some other form of engineering process?




OSIRIS was built by a consortium led by the Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Göttingen, Germany, in collaboration with CISAS, University of Padova, Italy.

The Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, France, the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucia, CSIC, Granada, Spain, the Scientific Support Office of the European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.

The Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial, Madrid, Spain, the Universidad Politéchnica de Madrid, Spain, the Department of Physics and Astronomy of Uppsala University, Sweden.

The Institut für Datentechnik und Kommunikationsnetze der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Germany. 

Can you find this Alien spaceship in the below image, it is there.



I've never seen anything like this Alien looking craft on anything whizzing through space - i.e looking at NASA comets, Jaxa or ESA videos and images of comets and asteroids.

There just isn't anything that remotely looks like this - at all. That must be taken in to account when people look at this?

Is this the reason why ESA sent satellites to this comet in the first place?

I mean, why this comet in particular?

It offers nothing that any other comet can offer, right?

Except this one has this strange little Alien spaceship parked up on it and it looks like it's been filled up with fuel or it's being energised?

I just don't know what it's fuel or energy needs are, but it damn looks strange to me. It looks positively Alien!

There are hundreds of comets flying around the Solar System, each of them a potential target for ESA's comet-chasing Rosetta mission.

As the mission took shape, the science team was faced with the difficult task of sifting through these candidates until they identified a handful of suitable objects.

Comet 67P is classed as a dusty comet, with a dust to gas emission ratio of approximately 2:1.

The peak dust production rate in 2002/03 was estimated at approximately 60 kg per second, although values as high as 220 kg per second were reported in 1982/83.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this and if you would, can you check out this video I made, thank you.

Please leave us a comment.

Source Image
Source Comet 67P NASA.
Source 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko.
Source Rosetta Web.
Source Reference The Hidden Dimension.
Source ESA Science & Technology YouTube.

Popular Post's

Popular Post's All time